Spațiul teatral și fantoma extensiei. Prolegomene la o topologie a ne-locului ca heterotopie a apariției pure

II. Scena ca basho: topologia nimicului și adiacronia reprezentației. 1. Basho: analitica locului și destituirea subiectului (arheologia unui loc care nu are loc)

Auteurs

  • Gabriel-S. Crișan Romanian Academy Library, Cluj-Napoca Branch

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.46522/CT.2025.02.03

Mots-clés :

khôra, implacement, adiachrony, absolute nothingness, Nishida Kitarō, basho

Résumé

The Theatrical Space and the Phantom of Extension. Prolegomena to a Topology of the Non-Place as a Heterotopia of Pure Appearance. II. The Stage as Basho: The Topology of Nothingness and the Adiachrony of Representation (1.)
This study undertakes a phenomenological-topological re-reading of theatrical space through Nishida Kitarō’s concept of basho (場所, place), as articulated in the 1926 essay “Basho” and the later triad surrounding “The Intelligible World.” Against the substance-metaphysics of the Western tradition – which has obsessively thematized what appears on the stage while leaving the stage itself, as the condition of appearing that never appears, in transcendental obscurity – we pursue Nishida’s inaugural gesture of ontological impoliteness: asking not what is, but wherein being is implaced. The analysis traverses the stratigraphy of nothingness (from oppositional to absolute nothingness), the destitution of the hypokeimenon in favour of the transcendent predicate, and the specular logic of a mirror without frame or reverse – a self-illuminating reflexivity without reflecting instance. Nishida’s topology is staged in critical counterpoint with the Platonic khôra and Derridean différance, Aristotle’s topos eidōn, Lask’s Gebietskategorie, Husserlian intentionality re-inscribed as residual mirroring, Heideggerʼs Lichtung, Gadamerʼs play, Deleuzeʼs plane of immanence, and Badiou’s evental site. The essay concludes by exposing the unthought temporality of basho – neither diachrony, synchrony, nor eternity – for which we propose the operative concept of adiachrony: the dis-articulated co-presence of the “no longer” and the “not yet” within the groundless ground of appearing, preparing the second movement of the study, wherein the stage will be read as the sole pure phenomenalization of the place that has no place.

Références

Aristotel, Despre suflet, traducere din greacă și note de Alexander Baumgarten, București, Editura Humanitas, 2005.

Aristotel, Fizica, traducere și note de N. I. Barbu, București, Editura Științifică, 1966.

Aristotel, Metafizica, traducere de Andrei Cornea, București, Editura Humanitas, 2007.

Badiou, Alain, Éloge du théâtre, Paris, Flammarion, 2013.

Badiou, Alain, L’être et l’événement, Paris, Éditions du Seuil, 1988.

Badiou, Alain, Petit manuel d’inesthétique, Paris, Le Seuil, 1998.

Deleuze, Gilles, Différence et répétition, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1993.

Deleuze, Gilles, Guattari, Félix, Qu’est-ce que la philosophie?, Paris, Éditions de Minuit, 1991.

Derrida, Jacques, Khôra, Paris, Éditions Galilée, 1993.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Wahrheit und Methode, Tübingen, J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1965.

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Phänomenologie des Geistes, în Werke 3, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Verlag, 1989.

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Wissenschaft der Logik, I, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Verlag, 1986.

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Wissenschaft der Logik, II, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Verlag, 2003.

Heidegger, Martin, „Das Ende der Philosophie und die Aufgabe des Denkens“, în Zur Sache des Denkens, Tübingen, Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1969.

Heidegger, Martin, „Die Zeit des Weltbildes“, în Holzwege, Gesamtausgabe, Band 5, Frankfurt am Main, Vittorio Klostermann, 1977.

Heidegger, Martin, Zur Sache des Denkens, Gesamtausgabe, Band 14, Frankfurt am Main, Vittorio Klostermann, 2007.

Husserl, Edmund, Cartesianische Meditationen (HUA I), Haag, Martinus Nijhoff, 1973.

Husserl, Edmund, Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, Erstes Buch, Haag, Martinus Nijhoff, 1976.

Husserl, Edmund, Phantasie, Bildbewusstsein, Erinnerung (HUA XXIII), Haag, Martinus Nijhoff, 1980.

Lask, Emil, Die Logik der Philosophie und die Kategorienlehre, Tübingen, J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1993.

Nishida, Kitarō, Place and Dialectic. Two Essays by Nishida Kitarō, traducere de John W. M. Krummel și Shigenori Nagatomo, New York, Oxford University Press, 2012.

Nishida, Kitarō, Intelligibility and the Philosophy of Nothingness, traducere de Robert Schinzinger, Honolulu, East-West Center Press, 1966.

Platon, Opere, VII, traducere de Andrei Cornea și Cătălin Partenie, București, Editura Științifică, 1993.

Plotin, Enneade, III–V, traducere de Vasile Rus, Liliana Peculea, Alexander Baumgarten, Gabriel Chindea, Elena Mihai, București, Editura IRI, 2005.

Téléchargements

Publiée

2025-12-16

Comment citer

Crișan, G.-S. (2025) « Spațiul teatral și fantoma extensiei. Prolegomene la o topologie a ne-locului ca heterotopie a apariției pure: II. Scena ca basho: topologia nimicului și adiacronia reprezentației. 1. Basho: analitica locului și destituirea subiectului (arheologia unui loc care nu are loc) », Recherches théâtrales, 6(2 (12), p. 57–85. doi: 10.46522/CT.2025.02.03.

Numéro

Rubrique

Articles