The Ideology of Collaborative Theatre: The Auteur Director and the Anticapitalist ‘Good Soul’

Auteurs

  • Richard Pettifer

Mots-clés :

ideology

Résumé

Today’s theatre artists working collaboratively position themselves as outsiders to a system of institutions, hierarchies, and structures. However, Alain Badiou states that theatre has historically been and presently continues to be an extension of state power, meaning that collaborative theatre may be just delivering the state’s mantra in a different guise. The propensity to avoid aesthetic definition further dilutes the potential for such theatres to truly generate change – in fact, they may be dangerously close to simply becoming agents for a neoliberal agenda, perfect examples of unwitting agents who have internalized the messages of the system to the point of invisibility. How might we examine the ideology of collaboration?
This paper argues for a self-analysis of the ideology of collaborative work existing ‘outside the system’. Furthermore, the auteur model is proposed as a counter-system, one in which certain proximity to power actually serves to (theatrically) threaten it.

Références

ARENDT, Hannah, 1951. The Origins of Totalitarianism, World Publishing Company.

BADIOU, Alain, 2008. Rhapsody for the Theatre: A Short Philosophical Treatise. [Bruno Bosteels trans.]. Theatre Survey. 49(2), p. 187-238, DOI: 10.1017/S0040557408000124.

BISHOP, Claire, 2006. The Social Turn: Collaboration and its Discontents. Art Forum, (February 2006), p.179-185.

Téléchargements

Publiée

2017-12-22

Comment citer

Pettifer, R. (2017) « The Ideology of Collaborative Theatre: The Auteur Director and the Anticapitalist ‘Good Soul’ », Symbolon, 18(2(33), p. 5–11. Disponible sur: http://uartpress.ro/journals/index.php/symbolon/article/view/73 (Consulté le: 15 mai 2024).

Numéro

Rubrique

Articles