The Ideology of Collaborative Theatre: The Auteur Director and the Anticapitalist ‘Good Soul’
Mots-clés :
ideologyRésumé
Today’s theatre artists working collaboratively position themselves as outsiders to a system of institutions, hierarchies, and structures. However, Alain Badiou states that theatre has historically been and presently continues to be an extension of state power, meaning that collaborative theatre may be just delivering the state’s mantra in a different guise. The propensity to avoid aesthetic definition further dilutes the potential for such theatres to truly generate change – in fact, they may be dangerously close to simply becoming agents for a neoliberal agenda, perfect examples of unwitting agents who have internalized the messages of the system to the point of invisibility. How might we examine the ideology of collaboration?
This paper argues for a self-analysis of the ideology of collaborative work existing ‘outside the system’. Furthermore, the auteur model is proposed as a counter-system, one in which certain proximity to power actually serves to (theatrically) threaten it.
Références
ARENDT, Hannah, 1951. The Origins of Totalitarianism, World Publishing Company.
BADIOU, Alain, 2008. Rhapsody for the Theatre: A Short Philosophical Treatise. [Bruno Bosteels trans.]. Theatre Survey. 49(2), p. 187-238, DOI: 10.1017/S0040557408000124.
BISHOP, Claire, 2006. The Social Turn: Collaboration and its Discontents. Art Forum, (February 2006), p.179-185.
Téléchargements
Publiée
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence

Ce travail est disponible sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International .
La licence CC-BY autorise la reproduction, la distribution, l'archivage et la citation, à condition que les auteurs soient mentionnés. La référence complète de l'article, figurant dans la section Exemples de citations de cette page, est obligatoire. Si possible, veuillez également ajouter un lien vers ce site web. Les droits d'auteur appartiennent aux auteurs.

