Nárcisztika a politikában

Authors

  • Gábor Kállai R.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46522/S.2022.02.7

Keywords:

politics

Abstract

Political NarcissismFacebook is an ideal field for all forms of political narcissism. The variations range from a simple obsession with the self – which is the best-known expressive mode of narcissism – to tense compensation of self-hate.
The classic narcissistic user is that who schematically hunts for likes in a fashionable hairstyle, with fashionable accessories, with fashionably cute children in a fashionable holiday spot, hiding in his/her own opinion bubble, erasing all opposing opinions.
However, Facebook is also a daily field of interaction, in which debate partners and opposing opinions appear. For the atypical narcissistic user a countering opinion is a form of self-confirmation: despite all “attacks” I am right and all enemies can be defeated or erased.
The elections and the currently unfolding war have fortified both types of narcissism. Professional politicians, on Facebook – independent of their private personalities – are forced to appear narcissistic in either forceful or refined ways, this being a necessity of their calling.
The analyst-type users – or those who present themselves that way – are in a more complicated situation. In this circle, the most affirming partner is one who comments with an opposing opinion. One can communicate an intellectual advantage over such partners using a so-called sense of reality derived from more education, or communicating an advantage in terms of grammar and use of language. The person writing the opposing opinion – depending on the topic – can be seen as uneducated, biased or a paid troll, who by the very act of posting their countering opinion confirms that the “analyst” is an exceptional individual.
And is, of course, right.

References

Az 1648. évi münsteri békeszerződés. Kiadja a Széchenyi István Egyetem Állam és Jogtudományi Kar Jogelméleti Tanszéke.

MARCUSE, Herbert, 1990. Az egydimenziós ember. Budapest: Kossuth Könyvkiadó, 22.

PAVIS, Patrice, 2005. Színházi szótár. Budapest: L’Harmattan Kiadó, 389‒390.

WALLERSTEIN, Immanuel, 2010. Bevezetés a világrendszer-elméletbe. Budapest: L’Harmattan Kiadó, 174.

Downloads

Published

20-01-2023

How to Cite

Kállai R., G. (2023) “Nárcisztika a politikában”, Symbolon, 23(2(43), pp. 83–86. doi: 10.46522/S.2022.02.7.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.